cost Low benefit Building an elevated highway is four times more expensive than a Bus Rapid Transit (BRT)
Economic loss: del GDP
4%
(Medina, ITDP 2012a)
Transportation sector has the biggest emissions
CO2
Public health problem
Air pollution
Road accidentes
Impoverishment
of families
Up to
50%
of a household income is spent on transportation
Families abandon their
60%
House when
of their income is spent on transportation and mortage
(IMCO, 2009)
&
Productivity Purchasing
MÉXICO: Ranks #69 144 countries on national transportation infrastructure Only 7cities with
rapid transit system
MÉXICO: lugar 69 de 144 países en infraestructura de transporte
SDASHD
Increasing public transportation doesn´t solve the problem
Car-oriented public invesments
Paradigm shif needed
Traffic to
accesibility
Traffic paradigm
+ roads
+ congestion
Urban mobility paradigm
Public transportation is not enough to reduce car use
Accesibility
paradigm
+
=
proximity of different land uses
FEDERAL GOVERNMENT COMMITMENT
a new model of
smart & sustainable urban development
Old vision present
of Urban Development
New vision of Urban
Development
hereafter vertical housing mix of homes, jobs and services sustainable urban mobility
high quality public space
National
Urban Development Housing
&
Policy
1. New urban development model
4. Land use management
2. Sustainable and adequate housing
5. Risk prevention
3. Urban mobility
6. Regional development
National
Urban Mobility Program
Availability, Affordability & Quality of urban commuting
National
Urban Mobility Program Challenges Institutional and legal framework
Complete Streets
Local government capacities
Integrated Transport Systems
Intersectoral coordination
Transit Oriented Development
Information for decision making
Transport Demand Management
Urban mobility advocay
Urban Freight Management
Transit Oriented Development 2015 Esfuerzos
Retos
TOD Guidelines for the development of Urban Planning Programs
Institutional and legal framework
Implemantation of Local TOD Policies and Projects Toolkit
Local government capacities
Status Marco normativo e institucional
Información e indicadores
Capacidades técnicas
Talleres Transversales de Impulso Intersectoral coordination de Políticas y Proyectos DOT Mass Public Transportation Indicators: coverage, compactness and density
Information for decision making
Promotion of TOD benefits between decision makers and citizens
Urban mobility advocay
Cultura de la movilidad
Coordinación intersectorial
Transit Oriented Development National TOD Policy and Project Workshop
Transit Oriented Development Local workshops Guadalajara
Mexico City
Aguascalientes
41
Transit Oriented Development Information for decision making ZM
Extensión TPM (km)
Población urbana (millones)
Cobertura (km/ millón de hab)
ZMVM DF
357
8.9
40.3
MTY
68.4
4.1
16.7
ZMVM EDOMEX
59
11.2
5.3
GDL
40
4.4
9.0
LEÓN
31
1.6
19.3
CHI
22
0.9
25.8
PUEBLA
18
2.7
6.6
Metrorrey L1 Metrorrey L2 Ecovía L1
Monterrey, Nuevo León
42
Fuente: Elaboración propia con información de BRTDATA.
Transit Oriented Development Information for decision making ZM
Superficie Bruta (ha)
Incremento (1980 -2010)
ZMVM DF
ZMVM EDOMEX
Superficie con TPM
ViveBus L1
9% 229,088
3.57 3%
GDL
61,024
3.82
11%
MTY
76,234
4.95
7%
PUEBLA
67,825
12.4
6%
LEÓN
21,476
6.81
13%
CHI
27,477
7.51
7%
Chihuahua, Chihuahua
43
Fuente: Elaboración propia con información de BRTDATA.
Transit Oriented Development Information for decision making ZM
Densidad Urbana (hab/ha)
ZMVM DF ZMVM EDOMEX
0-59 60-115 116-
Densidad DOT (hab/ha)
Densidad que propicia MUS (200/ha)
131.8
- 68.2
119.4
-80.6
87.8
LEÓN
75.0
90.8
-109.2
GDL
72.7
89.1
-110.9
MTY
53.7
57.2
- 142.8
PUEBLA
39.3
75.7
-124.3
CHI
31.0
36.4
-163,6
168 169-
243 244-
Guadalajara, Jalisco
44
Challenges for TOD implementation
Challenges for TOD implementation
Challenges for TOD implementation
Open spaces
Urban denisty
Transit Oriented Development Challenges for TOD implementation People don't object to the density of people.
They object to the density of cars Betsy Hodges, City of Minneapolis Mayor